Click here and press the right key for the next slide (or swipe left)
also ...
Press the left key to go backwards (or swipe right)
Press n to toggle whether notes are shown (or add '?notes' to the url before the #)
Press m or double tap to slide thumbnails (menu)
Press ? at any time to show the keyboard shortcuts
motivational states
primary motivational states
not directly modifiable by learning
preferences
changing, influenced by learning (and fashion, ...)
Can your primary motivational states diverge from your preferences?
Premises
1. Toxicosis directly influences only primary motivational states.
2. Primary motivational states directly influence only stimulus-driven actions.
Dickinson, 1985 figure 3; Balleine & Dickinson, 1991 figure 1 (part)
Devaluation - standard procedure:
Training: Rat is put in chamber with Lever; pressing Lever dispenses sucrose (novel food).
Devaluation: Rat is taken into another chamber, poisoned, and then exposed to sucrose.
Extinction Test: Rat returns to chamber with Lever; pressing Lever does nothing.
Dickinson, 1985 figure 3; Balleine & Dickinson, 1991 figure 1 (part)
Aversion does not directly influence preferences.
‘The pattern of results accords [...] with a role for an incentive learning process in the reinforcer devaluation effect;
not only must consumption of the reinforcer be paired with toxicosis,
the animals must also have an opportunity to contact the reinforcer after aversion conditioning if there is to be a change in instrumental performance’
Balleine & Dickinson, 1991 p. 293
Can your primary motivational states dissociate from your preferences?
motivational states
primary motivational states
not directly modifiable by learning
preferences
changing, influenced by learning (and fashion, ...)