Click here and press the right key for the next slide (or swipe left)
also ...
Press the left key to go backwards (or swipe right)
Press n to toggle whether notes are shown (or add '?notes' to the url before the #)
Press m or double tap to slide thumbnails (menu)
Press ? at any time to show the keyboard shortcuts
biological continuity and responsibility
If ‘the relations of practical concerns that typically go along with our identity through time are closely connected with psychological continuity
[...], then the Biological Approach does have an interesting ethical consequence,
namely that those practical relations are not necessarily connected with numerical identity’
Olson 1997, p. 70
Inconsistent Triads
Sam was an embryo; unless she recovers, Sam will be in a PVS.
Person essentialism is true.
The Psychological Continuity View of personal identity is true.
If Sam and Ayesha were to swap brains for a day, Sam would later be morally responsible for actions involving Ayesha-body.
You are only responsible for the actions of things numerically identical with you.
The Biological Continuity View of personal identity is true.
If ‘the relations of practical concerns that typically go along with our identity through time are closely connected with psychological continuity
[...], then the Biological Approach does have an interesting ethical consequence,
namely that those practical relations are not necessarily connected with numerical identity’
Olson 1997, p. 70