Keyboard Shortcuts?

×
  • Next step
  • Previous step
  • Skip this slide
  • Previous slide
  • mShow slide thumbnails
  • nShow notes
  • hShow handout latex source
  • NShow talk notes latex source

Click here and press the right key for the next slide (or swipe left)

also ...

Press the left key to go backwards (or swipe right)

Press n to toggle whether notes are shown (or add '?notes' to the url before the #)

Press m or double tap to slide thumbnails (menu)

Press ? at any time to show the keyboard shortcuts

 

Operationalising Visual Awareness

‘If psychologists can really identify something that deserves to be called perception without awareness, they must have an operational grasp on not only what it takes to perceive something, but on what it takes to be conscious of it.

\citep[p.~148]{Dretske:2006fv}

Dretske, 2006 p. 148

blindsight:

infer perception from discrimination of visual stimuli

This was the point of talking about simple seeing.

we infer lack of awareness from the subject’s reports

‘If psychologists can really identify something that deserves to be called perception without awareness, they must have an operational grasp on not only what it takes to perceive something, but on what it takes to be conscious of it.

\citep[p.~148]{Dretske:2006fv}

Dretske, 2006 p. 148

blindsight:

infer perception from discrimination of visual stimuli

we infer lack of awareness from the subject’s reports

Can you perceive something without being perceptually aware of it?

Yes : Sidis

Yes : blindsight???

considerations just raised imply we should not consider Sidis as entirely compelling evidence.
What about blindsight? Should we consider this in the same way?

Weiskrantz et al, figure 2

Awareness makes no measurable difference to action.

This conclusion is not entirely safe because we are relying on the subject’s reports.
But wait ...

‘the claim that blindsight involves unconscious perception is largely based on a dissociation between responding in a biased task and performance in an unbiased forced-choice task’

Phillips, 2016 p. 435

\citep[p.~435]{phillips:2016_consciousness}
Looks like Philips is right ...

Weiskrantz et al, figure 2

‘the claim that blindsight involves unconscious perception is largely based on a dissociation between responding in a biased task and performance in an unbiased forced-choice task’

Phillips, 2016 p. 435

\citep[p.~435]{phillips:2016_consciousness}

‘He was insistently instructed, and frequently reminded, that he was to signal unaware only when he had absolutely no sensation or feeling or experience of the visual event, and he repeatedly confirmed his conformance with this instruction’

\citep[p.~6122]{weiskrantz:1995_parameters}

Weiskrantz et al, 1995 p. 6122

Never trust a philosopher!

Can you perceive something without being perceptually aware of it?

Yes : Sidis

Yes : blindsight???

Status : unresolved whether blindsight is evidence for perception without awareness at this point.

‘If psychologists can really identify something that deserves to be called perception without awareness, they must have an operational grasp on not only what it takes to perceive something, but on what it takes to be conscious of it.

\citep[p.~148]{Dretske:2006fv}

Dretske, 2006 p. 148

blindsight:

infer perception from discrimination of visual stimuli

we infer lack of awareness from the subject’s reports

But our current concern is to find a test for perceptual awareness. Can we make progress here?

‘objective criteria’

‘According to ‘objective’ criteria, unaware perception occurs when a subject’s performance in a forced-choice task is at chance’

\citep[p.~190]{pessoa:2005_what}

Pessoa et al, 2005 p. 190

I.e. any discrimination is evidence for perceptual awareness.

Is this a good criterion?
Criticism of objective criterion The objective criterion isn't s criterion for awareness, it is a criterion for discrimination. We should only accept it if we this there's no discrimination without awareness.
More on the objective criterion: if there is perception it may trigger action or shift. In attention or some further processing, and awareness of this could be used to discriminate. So intentional, explicit discrimination tasks are of course tests of awareness of some.kind : but they are not tests of *perceptual* awareness.
Support for this criticism of objective measures: 'they presuppose, unlike subjective methods, that awareness of some information and (behavioral) sensitivity to that same information involve the very same processes' \citep[p.~22]{timmermans:2015_how}

'Above-chance performance on a forced-choice task involving the masked stimulus need not necessarily be due to conscious knowledge'

\citep[p.~27]{timmermans:2015_how}

Timmermans & Cleeremans, 2015 p. 27

'The challenge of measuring awareness based on behavioral measures, despite the substantial progress achieved over the years, remains essentially intact'

\citep[p.~40]{timmermans:2015_how}

Timmermans & Cleeremans, 2015 p. 40

awareness : Dretske’s proposal

‘rTa: S is aware of X = S perceives X, and information about X is available to S as a reason (justification) for doing what she wants (chooses, decides) to do’

‘If psychologists can really identify something that deserves to be called perception without awareness, they must have an operational grasp on not only what it takes to perceive something, but on what it takes to be conscious of it.

\citep[p.~148]{Dretske:2006fv}

Dretske, 2006 p. 148

blindsight:

infer perception from discrimination of visual stimuli

we infer lack of awareness from the subject’s reports

we infer lack of awareness from information not being available to the subject as a reason for action